On what subject(s) are you an authority?
Helping people to heal their souls . By listening and talking to them.
On what subject(s) are you an authority?
Helping people to heal their souls . By listening and talking to them.
MORNING AT JWD ( or RUMI and ME đ)
After a berry smoothie and scrambled eggs with avocado and asparagus
Satiated my cardio driven hunger and my conscience,
I was checking out a book online
Inspired by a friendâs fb post on Rumi and Shams.
I decided then that a shot of espresso at Nandan
Would help the stream of consciousness to have a longer run
As I was leaving Cou Cou I decided to ask for the name of the Maltese cutie Who was subjecting the menu to such close scrutiny
And believe you me
She is called Rumi !
At Nandan, as I contemplated the idea of serendipity
Another beauty appeared with an air of levity
She is called ginger not Shams
Such a pity
But serendipity is serendipity
So how about ginger espresso instead of ginger tea ?!
Some good old epiphany
With a topping of irony


–
___
I make myself a cup of coffee every morning, beginning with the grinding of beans. I did that a bit late today, when I took a break after reading half of Aditi Rathoâs book for children at one stretch. The reading – and of course, the caffeine hit – made me think.
âWill literature decline with the advent of AI? Is literature still important for humankind or will it just be a mere hobby for some sedentary people?â
These arenât questions one typically asks after reading a childrenâs book. But then again, a good childrenâs book often has the power to remind us of all that is pure, profound, and quietly revolutionary.
What struck me was this: in a world racing towards automation, simulation, and instant everything, here was a book that slowed me down. It asked for imagination, not interaction. It offered delight, not data. It nudged the mind gently, instead of overwhelming it with options.
So, will literature survive the age of AI?
Perhaps not in the way weâve known it. Mass-market writing might become more formulaic, more tailored to metrics and mood graphs. Instant plots, hyper-personalised endings, AI-generated novels with chapter-wise sentiment analysis. All perfectly possible.
But literature – true literature – was never about utility. Itâs about us. Our contradictions, our wonder, our madness, our silences.
AI can simulate a story. It can even write a beautiful sentence. But can it write from heartbreak? From longing? From memory blurred by time and scented by nostalgia?
Can it make a child laugh and make a parent pause to think?
Can it surprise you not just with what it says – but why it says it?
Reading Aditi Rathoâs freshly published book ( Suzie Mistry and The Imagination Factory ) reminds me that the spark of literature lies not in sophistication but in soul. And for that, you need a beating human heart, not just a brilliant algorithm.
So maybe literature will become a niche hobby. But it wonât be because of AI. Itâll be because we stop making time for it.
And that, like missing your morning coffee, would be a shame.
â
Now back to the book. There is dragon waiting in the next chapter đ


–
Confession Time đđ
I have never read a Harry Potter book. Yes, you heard that right.
This, despite both my children- Siddharth Ratho and Aditi Ratho – being Potterheads. In fact, Aditiâs devotion continues to this day, long after growing up and acquiring all the signs of responsible adulthood (jobs, deadlines, her own business venture now – and the ability to function without a wand đ).
Iâve always stood my ground – with this (very grown-up sounding) logic:
âWhy read fantasy when real life – and fiction based on it – is already so fascinating?â
To which Aditi would patiently say, year after year, âJust read the first ten pages. Youâll love it.â
I didnât do it. Not becuase I am stubborn- just⌠habitual realism đ. My children even got my late father to read a few Harry Potter books. But I did not relent đ
But then something magical happened.
Aditiâs debut novel â Suzie Mistry and The Imagination Factory â got published last week! đĽšđŤ
Iâm immensely proud – the kind of pride that makes you sniff the pages, carry the book around like a trophy, and tell complete strangers, âMy daughter wrote this!â..My late father and late father in law must be so proud too – wherever they are.
âŚAt this point, refusing to read my daughterâs book just because Iâm ânot into the genreâ would be⌠well⌠churlish (and grounds for family disownment đ).
So I read the first page.
And guess what? Iâm hooked !
Turns out magic runs in the family after all đ¤
Reading it tonight.
And yes, you can find it on Amazon. đ

I was never very interested in travelling for sightseeing.
Partly because I assumed thatâs what travel was all about – seeing monuments, ticking off tourist spots, and posing near âmust-seeâ sights.
And since I hadnât travelled much, I didnât feel like I was missing anything.
After all, you can read about countries.
Watch documentaries.
Zoom in on Maps.
What more could travel offer?
And yet – whenever I visited a new town, a remote village, or even someone elseâs home in a different setting, something shifted inside me.
I used to think it was just the novelty of being on a trip that I enjoyed -and that the serious pursuit of travel wasnât worth the time, money, or effort.
Especially because I wasnât -and still am not- into sightseeing.
(Or being seen near sights!)
And if all one wants is do is to eat, drink and relax with family or friends, then one resort is as good as another. The location hardly matters.
But over the years, through journeys prompted by work, family, friends – and now, occasionally, by my own curiosity – Iâve come to realise something:
Travel does recharge my batteries.
But more importantly, it expands my mind.
Not despite skipping the sightseeing – but because I do.
And itâs often the small things:
A brief conversation with a stranger.
Observing how people move, speak and smile.
Noticing how a community, a sreet or a city wakes, breathes, walks, eats, drinks, works and unwinds
Watching how people watch over their children in a park
Watching how dogs greet and meet
âTravel isnât always about distance. Sometimes itâs about perspective.â – Anonymous
When youâre not rushing from one attraction to the next, you start noticing the texture of life:
⢠How do people greet each other ?
⢠What does a quiet evening sound like ?
⢠What do people complain about? What do they celebrate?
⢠What do their markets smell like?
⢠What expressions do people wear – on the streets, in cafĂŠs, in museums, on crowded trains?
When people ask me about all that I saw or what Ivdid after I return from longish travels, I often find it difficult to answer đ.
So hereâs what I ask you.
Is travel just about âseeing the worldâ? Or is it about learning to see differently?
Can we travel not to escape life, but to witness how life is lived elsewhere?
Is it okay to skip the brochure-worthy sights – and still return with insight?
Is it a good idea not to seek out the familiar when one travels – â ourâ food and â ourâ people ?
I think so. Do you ?
âOneâs destination is never a place, but a new way of seeing things.â -Henry Miller
Let me know what you think – and what kind of travel has changed you.
_
For millions of working people in Indian cities, street food vendors are more than a convenience-theyâre a lifeline. Affordable, accessible, and often delicious, these vendors serve the city in more ways than one.
And yet, despite legislation championed by well-meaning activists, and progressive judicial pronouncements-like those from the Bombay High Court-the lived reality of street vendors remains precarious.
They continue to be treated as encroachers by city planners and administrators. Ironically, even those with hearts bleeding for environmental, gender, or human rights causes often look past (or away from) the rights of the people feeding the city from its pavements.
Over the years, a few officers at the helm in the BMC have crafted schemes to accommodate street food vendors with sensitivity – and due regard for hygiene . Judges have issued detailed orders to balance livelihood and urban order. And yet, on the ground, very little has changed.
The truth is: Indian cities still havenât figured out how to plan with the informal sector instead of despite it.
A fundamental shift is required – from managing street vendors as a âproblemâ to recognising them as part of the solution to urban hunger, unemployment, and even safety.
After all, a vibrant and safe street is a lived-in, watched-over, and easily fed street.
And sometimes, itâs also where joy quietly arrives in a rain-drenched city :
Despite early morning showers in Mumbai today, I made my way through Kalanagar to pick up breakfast from a vendor as a surprse for my wife.
Muthuram arrived in a kaali-peeli cab all the way from Dharavi, carrying snow-white idlis and two kinds of chutney in large stainless-steel containers . The aroma of the soft idlis and the bold spices in the chutneys cut straight through our jet lag – bringing joy and the unmistakable flavour of the country we call ours . đ

For centuries, science and technology -paired with the engines of enterprise, whether public or private -have propelled humanity forward. From the industrial revolution to the digital age, our ability to harness innovation has created wealth, expanded life expectancy, and improved the ease of living in ways our ancestors could never have imagined.
Artificial Intelligence is the next frontier in this journey. Its potential to optimise systems, personalise services, accelerate discovery, and transform industries is both exhilarating and undeniable. In areas ranging from healthcare and logistics to education and finance, AI promises to deliver faster, cheaper, and often better solutions. Even the business of entertainment -once the stronghold of human whimsy and imagination -is already seeing disruption through synthetic voices, AI-generated scripts, personalised content, and immersive virtual experiences.
And yet, as the biblical wisdom reminds us, âMan does not live by bread alone.â
A higher standard of living does not automatically translate into a higher quality of life. Wealth and convenience may add comfort, but they do not guarantee meaning. While machines may be trained to simulate emotion, they cannot yet feel it. While they may reproduce the patterns of human creativity, they do not suffer, yearn, laugh, or long for transcendence.
In an age of AI-generated poems and paintings, the human soul still seeks something else -authenticity, connection, purpose. These are not just data points to be predicted, but lived experiences to be understood.
This doesnât mean AI is the enemy of meaning -far from it. It can be a powerful ally in expanding access to knowledge, preserving heritage, and enhancing human creativity. But it must remain a tool, not a replacement, for the very things that make us human.
As we race ahead in our pursuit of innovation, we would do well to ask not just what we can automate, but what we should preserve -wonder, ambiguity, silence, story, art. These are not bugs in the human system. They are features of a meaningful life.
In the end, our greatest challenge may not be building machines that think -but remembering what it means to be.
â-
Readings :
⢠Yuval Noah Harari, Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow â On the future of humanity and the implications of AI on human meaning.
⢠Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism â On how digital technologies reshape personal and social meaning.
⢠Martha Nussbaum, Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities â On the value of imagination, emotion, and the humanities in an increasingly utilitarian world.
⢠Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial â A classic text on the philosophy of artificial systems and their limitations.
⢠Jaron Lanier, You Are Not a Gadget â A passionate argument for preserving human individuality in the digital age.

The constitutions of liberal democracies owe their moral and institutional foundations to the ideas of Western political philosophers. From Lockeâs theory of natural rights to Rousseauâs social contract, from Montesquieuâs doctrine of the separation of powers to Millâs principled defence of liberty and reasoned dissent, these frameworks emerged not just from political necessity, but from intellectual conviction -often nurtured in the lecture halls and libraries of European and American universities.
For centuries, these institutions have served as both fountainheads and guardians of liberal thought. They have cultivated freedom of expression, the spirit of critique, and the value of dialogue – qualities that are not merely academic ideals, but essential to the functioning of any liberal democracy.
And yet, today, universities find themselves under siege.
Across the world, populist leaders have mounted rhetorical and institutional attacks on centres of learning and critique. Donald Trumpâs disdain for expert opinion, Viktor OrbĂĄnâs crackdown on independent academic institutions, and Recep Tayyip ErdoÄanâs mass purges of university staff are not isolated acts. They are part of a broader populist playbook that seeks to undermine independent sources of authority, question the legitimacy of knowledge producers, and recast complexity as elitism.
These leaders have mastered the art of turning the university into a symbol -not of enlightenment, but of detachment, arrogance, and ideological bias. In populist narratives, the academic becomes an enemy of the people: too theoretical, too liberal, too disconnected from âreal life.â This characterisation is not just politically convenient -itâs dangerously effective.
And hereâs the deeper irony: the intellectuals who shaped our democratic ideals anticipated this moment.
Alexis de Tocqueville warned of the tyranny of the majority and the pressures of conformity in democratic societies. Mill argued for the protection of minority opinions -not despite democracy, but for its preservation. Hannah Arendt diagnosed the fragility of truth in the face of political power. Karl Popper, in The Open Society and Its Enemies, cautioned that democracy can only be sustained by institutions capable of welcoming dissent and resisting ideological closure.
These warnings were not abstract. They now resonate with uncomfortable clarity.
Letâs be honest: asking an intellectual to be an entrepreneur is like asking a cat to swim laps. Sure, it might happen⌠but youâre better off not watching.
And handing over a philosophy department to an entrepreneur? Brace yourself for a TED Talk titled:
âOptimising the Socratic Method for Scalable Impact.â
The core issue? Intellectuals think too much. Entrepreneurs think differently. Often with less hesitation, and more espresso.
1. The Intellectualâs Business Plan
Picture this: an intellectual pitching a startup. They begin with:
âFirst, let us deconstruct the very concept of âvalue.ââ
Their PowerPoint has footnotes, a bibliography, and an appendix titled âOntology of Disruption.â
By slide three-somewhere between Hegelian Dialectic and Late Capitalist Consumer Conditioning-half the investors have quietly left the room.
But the intellectual isnât rattled.
âEven failure is a construct,â they murmur, already drafting a paper on why their startup deserved to collapse.
2. The Entrepreneurâs Thesis Defence
Now flip the scenario. An entrepreneur walks into academia, takes the stage at a philosophy colloquium, and announces:
âI have a 3-step plan to monetise Kierkegaard.â
They propose turning existential dread into a subscription model:
âAnxiety-as-a-Service (AaaS): Guaranteed Identity Crisis in 30 Days or Your Money Back!â
The ethics professor has a mild nosebleed. The Dean discreetly updates his LinkedIn profile.
3. Time Horizons
Intellectuals think in decades-sometimes centuries. Theyâre focused on âlong-term human flourishing.â
Entrepreneurs? Theyâre focused on âshort-term Series A funding.â
Ask an intellectual how long itâll take to launch their idea, and you might hear:
âDepends. Are we using Aristotelian, Newtonian, or quantum time?â
Ask an entrepreneur, and the answer is:
âNext quarter. Unless we pivot.â
(They donât know where yet. Just⌠somewhere new.)
4. Tolerance for Ambiguity
Intellectuals thrive in grey zones. They bathe in nuance.
Entrepreneurs? Not so much. They hear âmaybeâ and immediately break into a sweat.
Where the intellectual distrusts easy answers, the entrepreneur needs one:
âMove fast and break things.â
To the intellectual, thatâs a cautionary tale.
To the entrepreneur, itâs a motivational poster.
5. Their Relationship with Reality
Intellectuals are obsessed with describing reality.
Entrepreneurs are obsessed with ignoring it-just long enough to bend it.
One might sit in a library asking, âDoes truth exist?â
The other is out raising $10 million for a startup called Truthify-a blockchain-powered platform to verify facts (which may or may not be facts).
6. The Entertainment Factor
That said, thereâs one place where both tribes come together beautifully: entertainment.
When two ego-driven entrepreneurs go head-to-head-neither weighed down by the burden of intellectual humility-we intellectual types grab the popcorn.
(Some of you were thinking Musk and Trump, werenât you?)
We sip tea, sketch game theory models, quote Machiavelli, and make bold predictions.
And weâre usually wrong-because the winner isnât the cleverest⌠just the one with the better marketing team.
Still, itâs good fun for all involved.
In Conclusion
Intellectuals want to understand the world before acting.
Entrepreneurs want to act before the world realises what theyâre doing.
Put simply:
If you ask an intellectual to build a boat, youâll get a 300-page treatise on the ethics of floating.
Ask an entrepreneur, and youâll get two soda bottles duct-taped to a door.
âMinimum Viable Product!â
And you know what? The world needs both.
The thinker to ask, âShould we?â
And the doer to shout, âToo late, already did.â
Just⌠maybe not on the same whiteboard.
#Intellectual # Entrepreneur #Trump # Musk #Irony
There are the mystics.
âI searched for God and found only myself. I searched for myself and found only God.â
-Rumi
âWho am I?â
-Ramana Maharshi
And then there are âmen of Godâ !
These men-and thankfully, sometimes women-deliver sermons, write thick books, and produce elaborate theological frameworks, possibly with diagrams. They explain the grand scheme of God, in which, they assure you, you have a place.
Preferably a humble one.
And if you follow the rules, pay attention, and attend the right seminars, you might even upgrade your spiritual seating arrangement.
đ The Men of God: Spiritual Bureaucrats?
These holy professionals are the architects of celestial systems. They give us:
Doctrines to follow.Prayers to recite . Behavioural KPIs.
They are like divine travel agents, promising package tours to paradise with a stopover in purgatory if you forget to fast on the right day.
They mean well. One hopes.
But thenâŚ
đ§ The Mystics Enter the Scene
And now, ladies and gentlemen, cue the mystic.
He shows up barefoot, probably late, and says one sentence-maybe two.
And suddenly, your soul leans in.
âYou were never born, and you will never die.â
-Nisargadatta Maharaj
What?
Just that. No syllabi. No ten-part series.
The mystic doesnât explain the mystery.
He becomes it. Or better, he reminds you that you are it.
The Grand Scheme vs. The Grand Shrug
Letâs be clear: The men of God have their place. They give us structure, direction, and answers to spiritual FAQs.
They hand out cosmic flowcharts with boxes like âKarma,â âGrace,â and âAdvanced Level Devotee.â
Meanwhile, the mystic sips his tea (probably herbal), looks at the chart, and says:
âBurn the map. You are already home.â
Itâs infuriating. And oddly liberating.
đ¤ So Whoâs Right?
Itâs not a contest.
The men of God offer guidance. The mystics offer a glimpse.
One comforts the mind.
The other disarms it.
We need both.
The men of God keep the spiritual trains running on time.
Mystics remind us thereâs no station, no train, and no timetable-just the vast stillness of being.
Men of God tell you to prepare yourself to meet God.
Mystics chuckle and whisper:
âYouâve never been apart.â
So next time someone tries to explain Godâs grand scheme with footnotes and a whiteboard, smile.
Then go sit quietly under a tree.
Ask yourself,
âWho am I?â
And wait.
The answer may not come in words.
But if it does, itâll likely fit on a post-it note-or a poem.
Or better yet, it will come with no words at all.